Image provided by Quest Optical
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit our website.
Performance and versatility can be greatly improved by using them in combination with a primer. The combination of hardcoat and primer are often referred to as a hardcoating system. The primer provides adhesion to multiple substrates, impact resistance and tintability. The hardcoat provides abrasion and scratch resistance, as well as a host of other features. For the lab and manufacturer, working closely with the hardcoating supplier, one can carefully select both primer and topcoat, and thereby optimize performance of the hardcoating system.
Thermal vs. UV: Most coatings are cured by either UV light or heat (thermal) exposure. The choice of cure method depends on the chemistry of the coating. Each of these two types of coatings has their advantages and disadvantages. The following is a summary of the general pros and cons of each. These are typical attributes of each of these classes of coatingsnot all coatings in each class are alike.
Thermally Cured Coatings: Thermally cured coatings were traditionally used only by lens manufacturers and referred to as factory coatings or the front side coating on a semi-finished lens blank. They have good to excellent abrasion resistance and AR compatibility. They allow the option of using primers to achieve better adhesion, tintability and impact enhancement. Most thermally cured coatings are designed for adhesion to a single substrate. This makes them ideal in the lens manufacturing environment. The use of a primer, however, allows the same coating to be used on multiple substrates or even as an overcoat (more details below). This has resulted in increased usage of thermally cured coatings at labs and retailers. Thermally cured coatings are generally thought to be more compatible with AR and mirror coatings. Thermally cured coatings can be spin or dip coated. Thermally cured coatings have longer cure times (typically one to four hours) and have limited substrate compatibility.
UV Cured Coatings: UV cured coatings are traditionally used in the laboratory environment and at some lens manufacturers. The advantages of UV cure coatings are quick cure time and multiple substrate compatibility. This makes them ideal for the laboratory or retailer where multiple substrates are used and quick turnaround times are expected. UV cured coatings can be applied by spin coating, dip coating or in-mold coating. Spin coating is the most typical method of application. UV cured coatings are typically lower in abrasion resistance and often less compatible with AR and mirror coatings. UV cure coatings often have good steel wool abrasion resistance, but do not perform as well as thermally cured coatings in the Bayer Abrasion Test (more on test methods below).
Hybrid Coatings: This is a new category of coatings. The goal is to combine the "best of both worlds." These coatings are cured by first exposing them to UV light, followed by a short thermal cure. This results in a coated surface with the abrasion resistance and AR compatibility of thermally cured coatings and the quicker cure time of UV cured coatings.
Overcoating: Overcoating is the technique of applying a hardcoat over an existing hardcoat. This is used to apply the same coating on the front and back surface of a lens that already has a factory coating on the front surface or both sides of the lens. This allows the lab or retailer to apply a premium hardcoat with consistent performance on both surfaces and on all substrates. A primer is used to achieve adhesion on a variety of factory coatings, as well as a variety of bare substrates. A thermally cured coating is then applied over the primer. Using this process, the lab or retailer can produce lenses with premium abrasion resistance, optics and AR compatibility on both surfaces and on all substrates. Some coating systems require that lenses have the factory hardcoat etched off with an acid wash before overcoating.
Comments
0